Toll free1800 1020 418Fees & syllabus ↗APPLIED AI · LIVE ONLINE · FOUR-WEEK PROGRAM
Build a checked chronology, evidence map and issue-based preparation pack from a fictional commercial dispute.
Ideal for: commercial arbitration lawyers, dispute-resolution associates, litigation support professionals and in-house disputes teams.
Entry requirement: Familiarity with commercial disputes, pleadings and evidence review. No coding required.
Two 90-minute live sessions weekly. Fees, dates and tool access confirmed before enrolment.
WHO THIS PROGRAM IS FOR
commercial arbitration lawyers, dispute-resolution associates, litigation support professionals and in-house disputes teams.
You will produce: Source-linked chronology and missing-record list → Issue-evidence matrix and contradiction register → Argument outline, authority verification log and hearing brief → Final chronology, evidence map and checked preparation brief.
Scope: Counsel-side preparation in an Indian commercial-dispute context. No outcome prediction, judicial decision automation or guarantee of admissibility.
SAMPLE SYLLABUS EXERCISE
Illustrative fictional example; not legal advice.
An email records dispatch, while the claim chronology labels the same date as receipt.
Keep dispatch and receipt separate, request delivery evidence and correct the chronology before drafting.
Keep the document reference and exact wording beside every finding. Mark missing evidence as missing.
PROGRAM SYLLABUS · FOUR WEEKS
Two 90-minute live sessions per week, eight sessions and 12 live hours total.
Three hours of independent practice per week, 12 additional hours total. Extra review sessions are separate.
Applied AI practice: extract the source first, structure the findings, challenge omissions and verify the result against original records.
Source-linked chronology and missing-record list
Applied AI practice: extract the source first, structure the findings, challenge omissions and verify the result against original records.
Issue-evidence matrix and contradiction register
Applied AI practice: extract the source first, structure the findings, challenge omissions and verify the result against original records.
Argument outline, authority verification log and hearing brief
Applied AI practice: extract the source first, structure the findings, challenge omissions and verify the result against original records.
Final chronology, evidence map and checked preparation brief
PRACTICAL PROJECTS
Source-linked chronology and missing-record list. Use fictional records, retain source references and hand over unresolved questions.
Issue-evidence matrix and contradiction register. Use fictional records, retain source references and hand over unresolved questions.
Final chronology, evidence map and checked preparation brief. Use fictional records, retain source references and hand over unresolved questions.
ASSESSMENT & TAKEAWAYS
Source accuracy 25% · issue detection 25% · fit to instructions 20% · reasoned next steps 20% · handover clarity 10%.
Final work uses a fresh fictional matter with planted errors. Correct fabricated references, unsupported conclusions and unmarked assumptions before completion. Track omissions and correction effort alongside time.
Keep your extraction instructions, matrices, review notes and verification checklist as a reusable practice pack.
APPLIED AI TOOL STACK
(A task-based mix will be selected for the cohort; every listed platform is not covered. Hands-on access, demonstrations and extra subscription costs are confirmed before enrolment.)
Chronology extraction, issue clustering, evidence comparison and draft preparation. Use approved accounts and fictional material; check extraction quality and source references.
Editable review notes, matrices and handover documents. Verify legal propositions against current official materials and suitable research databases. Participants confirm their software access.
Enterprise legal AI may be compared or demonstrated only when access is secured. No enterprise subscription, integration or vendor affiliation is promised.
FACULTY & YOUR COHORT
The faculty profile combines relevant legal-practice experience with hands-on AI use for this program’s document work. Teaching centres on legal judgment, live demonstrations, source checking and feedback on participant submissions.
Trainer names are not published on this page. Request the faculty background and session details when discussing your cohort. Teams may enquire about a separately scoped workshop.
COURSE FAQs
Designed for commercial arbitration lawyers, dispute-resolution associates, litigation support professionals and in-house disputes teams. Familiarity with commercial disputes, pleadings and evidence review. No coding is required.
Four weeks, with two 90-minute live sessions each week: eight sessions and 12 live training hours. Allow 12 additional hours of independent practice. Any extra review session is scheduled separately and excluded from live training hours.
Acceptance is not promised. Lawyers must check authorities, evidence, procedural rules and any required disclosure; AI output alone proves nothing.
Yes. Exercises use fictional document packs. Client documents are not required. Workplace use requires approved tools, permissions and confidentiality controls.
A task-based mix of Claude or ChatGPT, Word, Excel and legal research platforms is selected for each cohort. Hands-on access, any trainer-only demonstrations and additional subscription costs are confirmed before enrolment. Enterprise licences are not promised.
Counsel-side preparation in an Indian commercial-dispute context. No outcome prediction, judicial decision automation or guarantee of admissibility. Research tasks use dated official references and lawyer checking; AI text is not an authority.
The faculty profile combines relevant legal-practice experience with applied AI workflows and feedback on legal work. Trainer names are not displayed; request the faculty background, fees, tool access and cohort schedule before enrolment.
Submit Final chronology, evidence map and checked preparation brief. Assessment covers source accuracy, issue detection, fit to instructions, reasoned next steps and handover clarity. Invented wording, invented authorities and unmarked assumptions must be corrected. Completion is based on assessed work; no bar credit or legal qualification is promised.
Curriculum version 1.0 · 3 November 2026. Legal references and tool access are checked for the cohort.
RELATED COURSE SEARCHES & PRACTICE AREAS
These terms describe the syllabus and the legal teams it serves.
LET’S CHECK THE FIT
Share your practice area and whether you are joining individually or with your team. Ask for fees, faculty, schedule and tool access.
NEXT BATCH
Online or offline. Weekdays or weekends. Regular or fast track. Speak with an AI5 Academy advisor about the right starting level.